In the Figure above we see the coaching Process for a analytical point of view, with the normal coaching process being limited to Plan, do and then finally evaluate, this ats observe (Watching the match), Analysis (Analysing the results from the match) and it also looks at feedback from a analysed to a coach or directly a player rather than a coach to the team.
"The coaching process (as illustrated in Figure 1.) is an on-going cycle of performance and practice, within which a coach is required to evaluate, intervene, and feedback information to performers with the ultimate aim of enhancing future performance (Carling et al., 2005; Hughes and Bartlett, 2008). Within this coaching process, feedback is of critical importance if player and team performance is to improve (Carling et al., 2005). Traditionally the feedback process has been based upon a coach’s subjective observation of performance, which can be influenced by bias, emotion and previous experiences (Hughes and Bartlett, 2008). A subjective observation process is known to be unreliable and inaccurate, since even experienced football coaches have been shown to be able to recall just 59.2% of the critical events occurring during 45 minutes of football performance (Laird and Waters, 2008). this lack of accurate recall ability can lead to ‘highlighting’, where a coach’s perception of performance becomes distorted by those events that they can remember (Hughes and Bartlett, 2008). Ultimately this results in a lack of accuracy within both coaching feedback and decision-making, which can be improved with the use of objective, unbiased and comprehensive information performance analysis is capable of providing (James, 2006; Hughes and Bartlett, 2008)." (M Haines, 2013)
"The coaching process (as illustrated in Figure 1.) is an on-going cycle of performance and practice, within which a coach is required to evaluate, intervene, and feedback information to performers with the ultimate aim of enhancing future performance (Carling et al., 2005; Hughes and Bartlett, 2008). Within this coaching process, feedback is of critical importance if player and team performance is to improve (Carling et al., 2005). Traditionally the feedback process has been based upon a coach’s subjective observation of performance, which can be influenced by bias, emotion and previous experiences (Hughes and Bartlett, 2008). A subjective observation process is known to be unreliable and inaccurate, since even experienced football coaches have been shown to be able to recall just 59.2% of the critical events occurring during 45 minutes of football performance (Laird and Waters, 2008). this lack of accurate recall ability can lead to ‘highlighting’, where a coach’s perception of performance becomes distorted by those events that they can remember (Hughes and Bartlett, 2008). Ultimately this results in a lack of accuracy within both coaching feedback and decision-making, which can be improved with the use of objective, unbiased and comprehensive information performance analysis is capable of providing (James, 2006; Hughes and Bartlett, 2008)." (M Haines, 2013)